Security Graph
The relationship layer that links code, packages, pipelines, workloads, identities, data, owners, and findings.
Blast radiusOwnership pathsEvidence chains
Explore capability Interdict /Capabilities
Explore what your team can do with Interdict.
Start with a security question. Each capability connects the evidence you collect to a reviewable next action.
Catalog
Capabilities that turn evidence into action.
Explore connected security context, prioritize findings, investigate risk, and keep ownership and coverage visible throughout the workflow.
Risk Prioritization
Ranks findings by the context that changes remediation decisions, not scanner severity alone.
ReachabilityExposureExploit context
Explore capability AI Investigations
Graph-aware investigation summaries that explain why the risk matters and what evidence supports it.
Triage memoFix guidanceReview evidence
Explore capability Coverage Management
Shows where scanning is healthy, stale, failing, or missing across code and cloud surfaces.
Coverage gapsFreshnessScan health
Explore capability Private Outposts
Runs scanning and enrichment near sensitive repositories and cloud accounts without forcing every signal outward.
Private executionTool policySignal control
Explore capability Governance
Turns graph answers into repeatable policy, routing, reporting, audit, and owner workflows.
RoutingAuditRBAC path
Explore capability Deep Analysis
Run focused security reviews when scanner output is not enough.
Deep Analysis is the high-attention workflow for repositories, services, and applications that need expert review. It can focus specialist agents on security themes, then tie the findings back to graph context, owners, and remediation paths.
Run targetRepository or application
Auth and IDORAPI securityInjection pathsSecrets handlingBusiness logic
OutputEvidence-backed review, likely attack paths, and prioritized fix areas.
Questions Interdict helps you answer
Follow the affected scope, supporting evidence, and next action behind each decision.
Code-to-cloud pathingWhich vulnerable code reaches which running service, identity, and data store?
Reachability scoringWhich findings have recorded reachability and exposure evidence?
Deep analysis runsWhere do we need a focused security review beyond normal scanner output?
Ownership routingWhich team owns the affected path and the likely fix?
Coverage matrixWhere are scans missing, stale, failing, or incomplete?
AI evidence memoWhat happened, why it matters, and what proof supports the decision?
Policy-ready queriesWhich graph questions should become repeatable governance checks?
Access
See what your security graph would change.
Best fit today: teams with real finding volume, active cloud and code scanning, and a need to explain why one risk matters more than another.